# This Week in Nude Art History: When America Put a Nude Goddess on Top of Chicago — and the Country Lost Its Mind
**May 1, 1893.** The World’s Columbian Exposition swung open its gates in Chicago, and twenty million visitors streamed through the White City over the next six months. They came for the Ferris Wheel, the electric lights, the promise of American progress. What they got — what they weren’t prepared for — was a gilded nude woman, thirteen feet tall, standing on one toe on top of a building, catching the wind.
Her name was *Diana*. And she changed American art.
## The Sculptor and the Goddess
Augustus Saint-Gaudens was already America’s most celebrated sculptor when his friend, the architect Stanford White, asked him to create a weathervane for the tower of Madison Square Garden. Not just any weathervane — a figure of Diana, the Roman goddess of the hunt, drawn in bow, arrow nocked, balancing on one foot.
Saint-Gaudens said yes. And then he did what great artists do: he made it more ambitious than anyone asked for.
The first *Diana*, hoisted atop Madison Square Garden in September 1891, was eighteen feet tall and weighed eighteen hundred pounds. She was gilded in gold leaf, catching the sun like a beacon over Manhattan. She was also, unambiguously, completely nude.
The response was immediate — and divided. Art lovers admired the elegant lines, the way Saint-Gaudens had stripped the goddess down to her essential architecture of movement and balance. The body wasn’t decorative; it was structural. Every plane served the silhouette.
Anthony Comstock disagreed. America’s most powerful moral crusader, head of the Society for the Suppression of Vice, demanded the figure be clothed. Saint-Gaudens tried draping fabric over Diana, but the cloth blew away. Nature, it seemed, took her side.
## Chicago, 1893: The Nude Goes Public
When the World’s Columbian Exposition was being planned, Saint-Gaudens served as chief sculptural advisor. It was, as he told architect Daniel Burnham, “the greatest meeting of artists since the fifteenth century.” More than two hundred sculptures filled the grounds — and across the campus, nude and semi-nude figures were everywhere. MacMonnies’ Columbian Fountain featured nude figures rowing a barge. French’s colossal gilded *Republic* — a partially nude female allegory — anchored the Grand Basin. Frampton’s *A Caprice*, a “rollickingly cheerful” nude bronze woman, stood in the rotunda of the Fine Arts Building.
But *Diana* was the lightning rod.
The original plan was to place *Diana* atop the Woman’s Building — a powerful symbol of female achievement at an exposition that, for the first time in world’s fair history, featured a building dedicated entirely to women’s work. The Board of Lady Managers, led by Bertha Honoré Palmer, initially approved.
Then the Women’s Christian Temperance Union intervened.
The WCTU, one of the most powerful political organizations in late-nineteenth-century America, demanded that the nude figure be removed from the Woman’s Building. A nude woman — even a goddess — even a work of art — on a building dedicated to women’s dignity? Unthinkable. The irony was sharp: the very organization that had fought for women’s representation at the fair was now demanding that a representation of the female body, made by a woman’s form (the model was Julia “Dudie” Baird), be hidden.
*Diana* was moved to the Agriculture Building, where she stood atop the dome, gilded and turning in the Chicago wind, visible for miles.
## The Country That Couldn’t Decide What to Do with Bodies
The controversy over Diana wasn’t really about Diana. It was about the same question that animates every censorship battle in American art: *Who decides what the public gets to see?*
The same fair that featured a gilded nude goddess on its skyline also featured a painting — St. George Hare’s *The Victory of Faith* — depicting two Christian martyrs, a noblewoman and her slave, asleep in the nude on the eve of their execution. When visitors from rural Kansas encountered the sculpture and paintings on the grounds, the results were predictably absurd. A contemporary newspaper satire, “Joseph and Maria Have a Woeful Time,” described a horrified couple dodging nude figures across the entire fairground — Neptune on a column, A Caprice in the rotunda, mermaids in the gallery — until they finally found refuge, only to be blocked by “a bronze young woman whose pedestal stated that her name was Caprice… so rollickingly cheerful about her nudity that the couple gasped in horrified surprise.”
The joke, of course, was that the nude body had been central to Western art since ancient Greece. The 1893 exposition, with its Beaux-Arts architecture and classical程序r, was explicitly modeled on that tradition. American sculptors — trained in Paris, steeped in the European academic tradition — had brought that tradition home. The challenge was that the American public wasn’t sure it wanted it.
## Diana’s Afterlife: Censorship, Destruction, and Restoration
The original eighteen-foot *Diana* survived the fair but not the aftermath. In June 1894, a fire tore through the exposition buildings. The lower half of the statue was destroyed; the upper half was lost or discarded.
Saint-Gaudens redesigned *Diana* into a smaller, lighter, more elegant second version — fourteen and a half feet, poised on her left toe as originally intended, light enough to rotate with the wind. Hoisted atop the new Madison Square Garden in November 1893, she became the most famous public sculpture in America. For thirty-two years, she caught the sun over Manhattan — the first statue in history to be illuminated by electric light.
When Madison Square Garden was demolished in 1925, *Diana* was put in storage. A seven-year search for a New York home failed. No institution in the city that had celebrated her wanted her. In 1932, the New York Life Insurance Company gave *Diana* to the Philadelphia Museum of Art, where she stands today, restored and regilded, watching over the Great Stair Hall.
She is still nude. She is still beautiful. She is still controversial.
## What Diana Teaches Us About Art, Censorship, and Freedom
The story of Saint-Gaudens’ *Diana* is the story of American art in miniature. A nation that reveres freedom but flinches at the body. An artistic tradition that demands the nude as the highest form — and a public that can’t decide if the nude is art or obscenity. A sculpture that was too naked for the Woman’s Building but gorgeous enough for the Agriculture Building — as if the body is acceptable when framed by industry, but dangerous when framed by women’s achievement.
One hundred and thirty-three years later, *Diana*’s questions are still our questions. Who gets to see the body? Who decides? And what happens to a culture that hides the human form from public view?
At NALA, we believe the answer is simple: the nude body in art is not a threat. It is a tradition stretching back millennia — a tradition that demands skill, respect, and courage from the artist, and maturity from the viewer. Saint-Gaudens understood this. He made Diana naked not because he could, but because the form *required* it. The bow, the arrow, the wind, the balance — everything about the sculpture depends on the body being unadorned.
The WCTU wanted clothing on a weather vane. Saint-Gaudens gave the world one of the most elegant sculptures in American history instead. Sometimes the best response to censorship is simply to make something beautiful and let it stand.
—
*Augustus Saint-Gaudens, Diana of the Tower, 1899 (half-size version), Amon Carter Museum of American Art — Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons*
*Explore more about the nude in art history at [nudeartla.com](https://nudeartla.com), and learn how you can support figure drawing and artistic freedom at our [get-involved page](https://nudeartla.com/get-involved).*